Are Startups Ready for the Labour Codes?
India has
replaced 29 old labour laws with four major codes — the Code on Wages, 2019,
Industrial Relations Code, 2020, Occupational Safety, Health and Working
Conditions Code, 2020 and Code on Social Security, 2020. The purpose is to
simplify labour compliance and make doing business easier. However, from a
legal point of view, the real question is whether startups are practically
ready to follow these changes.
The most
important change is the new definition of “wages.” Earlier, many startups
structured salaries in a way that reduced statutory payments like provident
fund and gratuity by increasing allowances. Under the new system, the wage
structure must follow a fixed formula. This means startups may have to increase
their statutory contributions. Legally speaking, ignoring this restructuring
could lead to future penalties and disputes.
The
recognition of fixed-term employment is helpful for startups that hire
employees for specific projects. But the law now requires that fixed-term
employees receive benefits similar to permanent employees, including gratuity
on a proportionate basis. So while flexibility is allowed, it comes with
responsibility.
Another major
development is the inclusion of gig and platform workers under social security
laws. Startups operating through app-based or aggregator models must understand
that worker classification will now attract closer legal attention.
Contribution towards social security schemes may become mandatory. Misclassification
of workers can lead to serious compliance issues.
The
Industrial Relations Code has increased the threshold for prior government
approval in cases of layoff or closure to establishments with 300 or more
workers. While many startups may currently fall below this number, growing
companies must plan carefully. Employment decisions are no longer just business
decisions , they have legal consequences.
The
government has introduced digital registration systems and online inspections
to reduce unnecessary interference. However, penalties for non-compliance
remain strict. From a lawyer’s perspective, labour compliance should not be
treated as a secondary task. Investors today examine employment records,
contracts, and statutory filings during due diligence. Any non-compliance can
affect funding and valuation.
In simple
terms, the labour codes are pushing startups towards better structure and
transparency. They are not barriers to growth, but they require careful
planning. A startup that aligns its employment practices with the new legal
framework at an early stage will grow more confidently and sustainably. The key
question is not whether the law will apply — it certainly will — but whether
startups are preparing in time.